Washington, D.C. –Tuesday in a House Natural Resources Subcommittee on Federal Lands, Alaskan Congressman Don Young questioned U.S. Forest Service Chief Thomas Tidwell on his agency’s failure to approve new timber sales in Alaska, particularly Southeast Alaska, for the benefit of countless Alaskan communities and the very existence of the timber industry.

Congressman Young began his remarks by questioning Chief Tidwell on the President’s Fiscal Year 2016 budget request, which he says only “furthers the agency’s decline in timber management practices to the detriment of the Alaskan and American people.” He continued by prodding Chief Tidwell on the many failures of the U.S. Forest Service in Southeast Alaska.

“Mr. Tidwell, what I really want to ask you is what happened in Southeast; what are you doing with the Tongass Land Management Plan (TLMP) that passed in 2008; and where are we headed ?” asked Congressman Young. “What are you doing in Southeast to make sure we have a steady yield of timber?”

Congressman Young later pressed Tidwell on the issue of hydro power and what the U.S. Forest Service is doing to streamline the process for countless Alaskan communities that have submitted applications to develop the renewable energy resource.

“In the area of hydro, we run into road blocks all the time from the Forest Service,” Young said. “In your budget have you made a proposal to expedite the process to develop hydro so we don’t burn diesel fuel; so our small communities don’t have to fight the battle with your agency, the EPA, and everybody else to try to build real renewable energy? Is there anything in your mindset to work on hydro power?

Immediately following the Committee hearing, Congressman shared his frustration for the U.S. Forest Service lack of commitment for truly managing Alaska’s timber resources:

“Timber sales in Alaska have been reduced to less than ten percent of the allowable quantity in this Administration’s management plan, which has resulted in the loss of jobs, the shuttering of numerous mills across the state, and countless economic losses to our communities. While the Forest Service says they have prepared to offer four 10-year timber sales – each with a volume of 150-200 million board feet – they have dragged their feet and converted these plans to smaller stewardship projects. This will neither restore confidence in our industry nor allow investment in new facilities. Without a clear plan for increased timber sales by the Forest Service, Alaska’s timber industry will continue to suffer and eventually cease to exist.”

  don young, hoouse, natural lresources subcommittee, u.s. forest service