“We are concerned that the latest draft of the rule would fall far short of providing the full scale of debt relief that low- and middle-income Americans urgently need.”
Seven members of Congress on Monday sounded the alarm about the Biden administration’s evolving student debt cancellation plan and called on U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona to use his authority to provide broad relief.
After the right-wing U.S. Supreme Court in June struck down President Joe Biden’s initial debt relief plan—designed to cancel up to $20,000 per federal borrower—the administration launched a negotiated rulemaking process to establish an alternative plan under the Higher Education Act (HEA) of 1965.
The committee responsible for crafting the rule “has met several times already, but its final round of talks began on Monday and will continue through Tuesday,” reported USA Today. “Frustrations arose almost immediately. Committee members expressed disappointment in the department’s latest forgiveness proposal, released last week, which many said doesn’t go far enough in its current form to address the issues they’ve spent months debating.”
U.S. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), Sens. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.), Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), and Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), and Reps. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), Ayanna Pressley (D-Mass.), and Frederica Wilson (D-Fla.) are also unsatisfied with the draft, as they made clear Monday in a letter to Cardona.
“This regulation has the potential to improve the financial security of tens of millions of hard-working Americans who are currently trapped by crushing student debt,” the lawmakers noted. “However, we are concerned that the latest draft of the rule would fall far short of providing the full scale of debt relief that low- and middle-income Americans urgently need.”
The letter explains that under the draft, only four groups would be eligible for relief: “(1) borrowers with outstanding federal student loan balances that exceed their original principal balance, due to interest; (2) borrowers with loans that have been in repayment for over 20 or 25 years; (3) borrowers who are eligible for forgiveness under an enumerated repayment plan or loan program but have not enrolled; and (4) certain borrowers who took on loans to attend programs that provide insufficient financial value, lost Title IV eligibility, or were found to have committed misconduct.”
The U.S. Education Department (ED) “has also released an issue paper indicating the potential need for the rule to address a fifth category: ‘those experiencing hardship that is not otherwise addressed by the existing student loan system,'” the letter notes.
The HEA empowers Cardona to “enforce, pay, compromise, waive, or release” federal student loans. The lawmakers pressured him “to leverage this authority to its fullest extent, maximizing relief for the greatest number of borrowers facing financial hardship,” highlighting that 43.6 million borrowers “collectively owe an astronomical $1.65 trillion.”
“As we lend our support to your diligent efforts to provide debt relief through regulatory procedures, we urge you to consider several recommendations to strengthen the department’s debt relief rule,” the lawmakers wrote, detailing six proposals:
- Eliminate all debt that exceeds the original principal balance of the loan;
- Provide full cancellation, not just a waiver of excess interest, for borrowers who have repaid enough to cover their original principal;
- Eliminate the sudden cliff that would give full relief to borrowers whose loans first entered repayment at least 20 or 25 years ago, and no relief to similarly situated borrowers;
- Extend relief to borrowers with financial hardship and create a catch-all category for unforeseen forms of hardship;
- Extend relief to borrowers who have been victims of student loan servicer misconduct or error; and
- Eliminate the need for borrowers to submit burdensome applications by basing eligibility for relief on information that ED already has or that it can acquire from other agencies.
“We are encouraged by the department’s critical efforts to provide student debt relief through negotiated rulemaking. However, we believe more must be done to improve the draft regulatory text,” the letter concludes. “The Biden administration should take every
opportunity to use the authority Congress has already given it to deliver on the promises made to student loan borrowers.”
Acknowledging the letter on the Senate floor Monday, Schumer declared that “following the Supreme Court’s cruel, abrupt blocking of student debt relief, too many borrowers—too many—remain saddled with massive—in many cases, unbearable—amounts of debt. We can and we must do more to help these borrowers.”
After being paused throughout the Covid-19 pandemic and the legal battle over Biden’s first debt relief proposal, student loan repayments resumed in October. Since the high court’s ruling, federal borrowers across the country have pushed the president to continue pursuing sweeping debt cancellation.
“An Education Department spokesperson said the agency had received the letter, is reviewing it, and welcomes the input from lawmakers,” according toPolitico.
“The Biden-Harris administration is proud of our record of providing relief to borrowers as we work to fix the broken student loan system,” the spokesperson said in a statement. “This rulemaking process is about standing up for borrowers who’ve been failed by the country’s broken student loan system and creating new regulations that will reduce the burden of student debt in this country.”
Common Dream’s work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. Feel free to republish and share widely.
